Mapping the jurisdictional limits of arbitration: Doctrinal challenges in arbitral and non-arbitral subject matters
Author(s): Shweta Rohit Rathod and Vishnupriya Dadhich
Abstract: The rise of arbitration as a preferred mode of dispute resolution has necessitated a nuanced understanding of its jurisdictional boundaries. Arbitration, although autonomous, operates within the constraints of statutory and public policy limitations. The essential question that persists is whether all disputes are inherently arbitrable or whether there exist doctrinal impediments that circumscribe the arbitral domain. This article systematically analyses the jurisdictional contours of arbitration by categorizing arbitral and non-arbitral subject matters, examining legislative intent, judicial pronouncements, and theoretical frameworks to outline the doctrinal challenges that continue to perplex both practitioners and scholars.
Shweta Rohit Rathod, Vishnupriya Dadhich. Mapping the jurisdictional limits of arbitration: Doctrinal challenges in arbitral and non-arbitral subject matters. Int J Law Justice Jurisprudence 2025;5(2):40-43. DOI: 10.22271/2790-0673.2025.v5.i2a.215